Legislature(2015 - 2016)
2015-02-23 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2015-02-23 House Journal Page 0293 HCR 2 The following was read the second time: HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 2 Designating January 25 - 31, 2015, as Alaska School Choice Week. with the: Journal Page EDC RPT CS(EDC) NT 4DP 169 FN1: ZERO(H.EDC) 170 Representative Millett moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original resolution: CS FOR HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 2(EDC) Designating January 24 - 30, 2016, as Alaska School Choice Week. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Millett moved and asked unanimous consent that Representative Nageak be excused from a call of the House today. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Josephson: Page 2, following line 5: Insert "WHEREAS this resolution shall not constitute an endorsement of vouchers or education savings accounts nor a disparagement of teachers' unions;" Representative Josephson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. 2015-02-23 House Journal Page 0294 Representative Gattis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHCR 2(EDC) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Munoz, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Hawker, Nageak, Reinbold And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. **Representative LeDoux, who was excused (page 240), left the Chamber. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Tarr: Page 1, line 1 (title amendment): Delete "January 24 - 30, 2016" Insert "September 7 - 11, 2015" Page 2, lines 6 - 7: Delete "January 24 - 30, 2016" Insert "September 7 - 11, 2015" Representative Tarr moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Gattis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2015-02-23 House Journal Page 0295 CSHCR 2(EDC) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Foster, Gattis, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, Lynn, Millett, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Hawker, LeDoux, Nageak, Reinbold Absent: Munoz And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Representative Tuck placed a call of the House and lifted the call. The question being: "Shall CSHCR 2(EDC) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHCR 2(EDC) Second Reading Final Passage YEAS: 21 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, Lynn, Millett, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Nays: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Excused: Hawker, LeDoux, Nageak, Reinbold Absent: Munoz And so, CSHCR 2(EDC) passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.